BibleBucket

Mysteries & Missing Books
Context

The Gospel of Thomas

🕰️ Written: September 2025

Secret sayings, or something more?

Facts you can verify. Wisdom versus distortion, laid side by side.

Introduction

“These are the secret sayings which the living Jesus spoke, and Didymos Judas Thomas wrote them down.” That’s how the Gospel of Thomas begins. For some, it sounds like the missing gospel — hidden for centuries, finally unearthed. For others, it’s a warning of how quickly truth can be bent into something else. Either way, the Gospel of Thomas is real history. Found in Egypt in 1945, it is a fascinating artifact. But the evidence shows: it was not written by the apostle Thomas.

1) Discovery

In 1945, Egyptian farmers digging near Nag Hammadi uncovered a sealed jar containing 13 leather-bound codices. Inside: more than 50 ancient texts, including the Gospel of Thomas. The Thomas text was written in Coptic, but scholars traced it to earlier Greek fragments found at Oxyrhynchus. Dating: mid-2nd century AD — almost a century after the apostle Thomas would have died.

2) What’s Inside

Thomas contains 114 sayings attributed to Jesus. Each begins, “Jesus said…”. There are no miracles, no parables told as stories, no crucifixion, and no resurrection. It reads more like a wisdom collection than a gospel narrative.

3) Familiar and Strange

About half the sayings match Matthew, Mark, or Luke almost word-for-word (e.g., mustard seed; hidden treasure). Others are unique or cryptic: “The kingdom is inside you and outside you,” “Split wood, I am there,” and “Every female who makes herself male will enter the kingdom of heaven.”

4) Who Really Wrote It

Despite its title, the apostle Thomas didn’t write this gospel. Why? Date: mid-2nd century — too late for eyewitness testimony. Style: no story, only sayings — matches other Gnostic teaching texts, not apostolic gospels. Name use: It was common to attach a famous name to writings (pseudepigraphy) to give them authority.

So while the Gospel of Thomas is authentic ancient writing, it is not authentic apostolic testimony.

5) Why the Church Rejected It

Early church leaders knew about texts like this and warned against them. Irenaeus (c. AD 180) labeled Thomas and other “secret gospels” as false, written to twist the truth. Not suppression of hidden wisdom, but protection against distortion. Thomas focuses on “secret knowledge” (gnosis) for salvation rather than Christ’s death and resurrection.

6) Modern Appeal

Thomas resurfaced in the 20th century as a favorite in New Age and “lost gospel” circles. Many love it because it presents Jesus as mystical teacher, not Savior. Its appeal is the wisdom of Jesus without the cross of Jesus.

7) The Red Flag

What’s missing is louder than what’s present. The canonical gospels: Jesus dies, rises again, redeems. Thomas: Jesus says wise things — but there is no death, no resurrection, no salvation story. That absence shifts the entire message. Without the cross, you may admire Jesus — but you do not know Him.

8) The Takeaway

The Gospel of Thomas is worth reading as a window into 2nd-century Christian diversity. It shows how some groups tried to reshape Jesus into a teacher of secret wisdom. But it is not Scripture. It is not Thomas’s eyewitness testimony. And it offers a different gospel — one of insight rather than redemption. The words are fascinating. The truth is in what’s missing.